Laman Webantu KM2A1: 4209 File Size: 22.6 Kb * |
TJ KB AWSJ: Rezab Susut Kunci RM Dinilai Semula By Leslie Lopez 13/4/2001 6:07 pm Fri |
RAMAI PERCAYA RINGGIT AKAN DINILAI SEMULA
Ramai pakar ekonomi berpendapat sistem ekonomi negara yang
berpusat kepada kawalan wang sedang tergugat berikutan lemahnya
nilai yen serta merosotnya matawang serantau yang menyebabkan
ekspot negara menjadi semakin tidak kompetetif. Jika gejala ini
berterusan ringgit dijangka akan dinilai semula - jika tidak banyak
kilang akan merana dan pekerja terbuang merata. Mereka juga
berpendapat ini perlu dilakukan seberapa segera kerana rezab
asing negara semakin merosot kerana pelabur sudah berduyun-duyun
keluar. Jika terlalu lambat pelabur akan tawar hati dan sukar
untuk kembali lagi. Oleh itu mereka percaya ringgit akan dinilai semula dalam waktu
terdekat ini walaupun kerajaan sering menidakkannya. Hasilnya
indeks komposit BSKL meragam dibuatnya dan kini berada diparas
567.88 pada Rabu lepas. Bank negara cuba menenangkan keadaan dan mahu kilang meningkatkan
produktiviti. Tetapi saham merudum lagi kerana pelabur masih sangsi.
Analis berpendapat Malaysia terlalu leka dan megah kununnya ia telah
pulih dari krisis 1997-98 selepas mengenakan kawalan modal dan matawang.
Dalam tempoh itu kerajaan tidak bertindak serius untuk melakukan reformasi
dalam sektor koporat dan melupuskan syarikat yang tidak cekap. Syarikat
seperti MAS dan Renong diselamatkan dengan dana awam untuk melepaskan
kroni yang tersepit oleh berjuta-juta hutang. Malaysia sebenarnya bernasib
baik kerana DUA faktor telah menyelamatkannya dari terjunam teruk dalam
krisis. 1. Ekspot barangan elektronik ke A.S. yang agak tinggi dan
2. Harga minyak petroleum yang meningkat mendadak.
Kita selamat BUKANnya kerana kehebatan Mahathir menguruskan ekonomi.
Ekspot elektronik tidak terjejas ketika itu kerana permintaan global
barangan IT meningkat. Sekarang ia sudah terlalu tepu dan terjejas.
Tanpa kawalan matawang pun kita akan sakit juga.
Sila maklum dua sektor di atas adalah FDI jangkapanjang (long term FDI).
FDI baru dalam bidang lain begitu kurang. Banyak FDI yang masuk adalah
untuk memantapkan FDI sedia ada - seperti membesarkan kilang dan membina
indutri berasaskan petrokimia. Kini ekspot itu sudahpun terjejas akibat nilai ringgit yang tinggi.
Pasaran saham juga semakin merudum. Saham bank sendiri menjunam kerana
kolateral pinjaman yang berbentuk saham semakin tidak bernilai. Ini
akan melambatkan lagi penyusunan semula hutang koporat yang memang
sudah lembab itu. Impaknya - hutang lapuk (NPL) akan meningkat dan bank
akan semakin sukar memberi pinjaman sehingga membantutkan pertumbuhan
ekonomi sektor swasta. Menyedari masalah kelembapan pertumbuhan ekonomi, kerajaan mengumumkan satu
pakej rangsangan sebanyak RM3 bilion agar kurang terjejas oleh kemelesetan
di Amerika. Tetapi sentimen pasaran masih melemah. Standard & Poor telah mengubah
semula tahap matawang asing jangka panjang Malaysia dari positif kepada
stabil kerana kebimbangan terhadap melebarnya defisit fiskal, ketidak-tentuan
politik dan pemusatan keputusan muktamad.
Apa yang membimbangkan ialah rezab asing yang semakin merosot. Ia susut
4% dari bulan Februari 2001 lepas, satu kejatuhan tertinggi sejak pertengahan
2000. Rezab Bank Negara cuma mampu bertahan 4 bulan impot sahaja pada
penghujung Mac. Zeti memberi beberapa alasan seperti pembayaran balik hutang luar oleh
beberapa syarikat tempatan dan kehilangan nilai matawang asing yang
disimpan oleh Bank Negara. Kemerosotan rezab itu menyebabkan pengekspot mula meninggalkan ringgit
dan cuba membawa modal keluar dari dalam negara. Mereka menyimpan
hasil mereka dalam bentuk matawang asing di luar negara sebagai langkah
berjaga-jaga ringgit dinilai semula. Kunci tanda untuk diperhatikan di sini ialah rezab antarabangsa negara.
Jika ia merosot di bawah $25 bilion - cukup untuk menakung impot lebih
kurang 3 bulan - Malaysia terpaksa menilai semula ringgit jika tidak
makin sukarlah untuk menyekat modal keluar.
Kita meramalkan ia dilakukan selepas perhimpunan agung umno supaya
tidak tergugat presidennya. Tetapi ini bermakna banyak dana awam akan
dinoda dan dikorek seikut suka sebelum persidangan bermula supaya
tampak hebatnya si presiden menguruskan ekonomi negara.
Rafidah mahu rakyat dan pelabur lebih percaya kepada kerajaan daripada
analis. Soalnya bagaimana mahu percaya kerana kerajaan kerap mengubah
polisi bila sudah terdesak dan tidak tentu hala? Malah sanggup membatalkan
perjanjian royalti kerana geram dan dendam sehingga tercemar imej Petronas
dibuatnya. Menurut Financial Times khabar angin bertiup kencang kerana tiga faktor:
Kerajaan mengenakan kawalan modal dan matawang untuk mengelakkan dana keluar
kerana ketidak tentuan harga ringgit satu ketika dulu. Ini untuk mengelakkan
kesan globalisasi menghanyutkan Malaysia. Banyak pelabur terperangkap bila
ia dikuat kuasakan serta merta. Tetapi kesihatan politik lebih memainkan peranan dalam menentukan perubahan
nilai ringgit, menurut Barclays Capital. Inilah yang menyebabkan ketidak-tentuan
dan keresahan pelabur berterusan. Jika kerajaan mengubah nilai ringgit, dua syarikat gergasi yang kuat jaringan
politik - Tenaga dan Telekom akan terjejas kerana ia meminjam dalam bentuk dolar
A.S. Sebab itulah saham kedua syarikat 'bluechip' ini merana beberapa hari
kebelakangan ini sehingga meragam indeks komposit BSKL dibuatnya. Kesakitan
syarikat besar ini akan menyebabkan meningkatnya perbelanjaan pengguna dan
mereka mula resah apa mahu jadi dengan ekonomi negara. Apa yang dinyatakan
oleh pembangkang selama ini ada benarnya dan Mahathir telah merosakkan negara.
Maybank turut terjejas kerana ekonomi yang melembab akan menimbulkan masalah
NPL manakala kolateral pinjaman dalam bentuk saham akan mengurangkan keuntungan.
Ketiga-tiga syarikat gergasi ini menyumbang peratus tinggi dalam indeks BSKL.
Kita tidak akan dapat lari dari arus globalisasi dunia. Sedikit sebanyak kita
akan terjejas juga. Masalah kini amat kronik kerana dua negara penting yang
berdagang dan melabur dalam Malaysia - Amerika dan Jepun - sedang meleset.
Indeks NASDAQ dan Dow Jones sudahpun memecahkan beberapa rekod terendah - ini
membayangkan krisis akan berlanjutan sehingga penghujung tahun. Banyak kilang
di Malaysia bersifat 'contract manufacturing' atau mengilang mengikut kontrek
permintaan. Ini bermakna bahang atau gelombang kemusnahan akan tiba dalam
beberapa bulan yang akan datang. Jepun menghadapi masalah yang kronik juga. Mori sudah angkat tangan dan mahu
meletak jawatan. Krisis politik dan ekonomi melanda Jepun mengambil masa yang
panjang juga kerana hutang lapuk menimbun banyaknya dan penyangak negara sudah
menular jauh ke dalam jaringan politik Jepun. Bayangkan seorang presiden banknya
membunuh diri kerana di situlah terletak keperwiraan sebenar ala samurai daripada
bersekongkol dengan penyangak untuk menutup kebusukan.
-TJr Kapal Berita- Fortune Suicide in Osaka (portion) Tadayo Honma was one of Japan's most respected bankers. Then he took a job
running one of Japan's most troubled banks (Nippon Credit Bank). Two weeks
later he took his life. Late last summer, to hear his friends and former colleagues tell it, Honma
looked around and saw that the only way to save the bank he would soon be
running was painful and controversial. To emerge from bankruptcy under new
owners, Nippon Credit had struck an extraordinary deal: If debtors on its
books continued to go bust, the bank could seek reimbursement from the
government--in other words, from Japanese taxpayers already fed up with
bailing out their country's hapless banks. The problem would weigh heavily
on Honma as he searched, fruitlessly, for an honorable way out.
As the country's economic slump grinds on and bankruptcies mount, it's not
surprising that the number of suicides is increasing too. In the United States
about 23 working-age men per 100,000 kill themselves each year. In Japan the
number is 38, and since 1990 it has risen by 75%.
-Bill Powell- Rencana Rujukkan The Asian Wall Street Journal Shrinking Reserves Could Force By LESLIE LOPEZ KUALA LUMPUR, Malaysia -- In 1998, Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad
announced capital controls to protect the Malaysian economy from the
whiplash effect of financial globalization. Now, Malaysia is learning
that -- controls or not -- its fate remains tied to international
markets. Two weeks ago, Kuala Lumpur acknowledged that growth will slip below
the 7% expansion it projected for 2001, mainly because of the U.S.
economic slowdown's impact on Malaysian exports. Independent
economists predict inflation-adjusted growth could ebb to 3% or 4%
this year from 8.5% in 2000. What's more, some private economists and currency traders say
Malaysia's fixed-exchange rate regime -- the foundation of Dr.
Mahathir's capital controls policy -- is under threat. With the
ringgit pegged at 3.80 to the dollar, the recent weakening of the yen
and other Asian currencies is eroding the competitiveness of Malaysian
exports. Should this trend persist, some analysts believe Malaysia
will be forced to re-peg the ringgit or otherwise allow the currency
to depreciate. Signs of Capital Flight On Monday, pressure mounted on the ringgit peg when the central bank,
Bank Negara, disclosed that Malaysia's international reserves at March
31 had fallen 4% to $27.81 billion from $28.99 at end of February.
Malaysia's reserves peaked at $34.5 billion in June, but have eroded
steadily since. Economists attribute the decline, in part, to capital
flight. "It really is a one way bet because no one expects an upward
revaluation in the ringgit," says a regional currency strategist in
the Singapore office of a Japanese bank, echoing a widely held view
among traders. "If the yen and other currencies weaken substantially,
the ringgit could dip by 10%. But if the markets stay stable, then the
ringgit stays at 3.80." [Note: Mahathir Unveils Fiscal Plan Aimed at Bolstering Malaysia (March 28)]
Such views are gaining converts among foreign investors who have been
dumping shares on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange. Since early last
week, the benchmark composite index has declined more than 11%,
closing at 567.88 points on Wednesday. The index is down almost 23%
from this year's high of 736.74 in mid-February.
Malaysian policy makers dismiss talk of re-pegging the ringgit,
arguing that the country's economic fundamentals remain strong. Bank
Negara Gov. Zeti Akhtar Aziz says adjusting the peg downward against
the dollar would only create uncertainty and wouldn't encourage
domestic industries to strive for productivity gains. "In an
environment where demand is contracting, it would be unlikely that a
5% to 10% adjustment will bring significant increase to your exports,"
she says. 'Options Aren't Good' Some economists who track Malaysia believe that Kuala Lumpur won't
rush to re-peg its currency. But they add that maintaining the ringgit
at its current level won't be easy should other Asian currencies
continue to slide. "The policy options aren't good, but the least bad
option is to hold on until it is absolutely necessary to devalue,"
says Manu Bhaskaran, chief economist with SG Securities in Singapore.
The swoon in international equities markets is bringing into focus the
fragility of Malaysia's recovery from the 1997-98 Asian financial
crisis. Some economists have long argued that the Mahathir government
didn't use the reprieve afforded by capital controls to vigorously
pursue corporate reforms and weed out inefficient companies. Instead,
they say, Malaysia was lulled into complacency by a U.S.-driven export
boom, which helped growth rebound quickly. Malaysia has soft-pedaled
corporate restructuring, opting to bail out several politically
well-connected businesses -- including Malaysian Airline System Bhd.
and the troubled telecommunications unit of the Renong Group -- using
some public funds to do so. Such policies haven't been well received by investors in Malaysia's
stock market. Now, with currency concerns stoking more selling,
economists and bankers say that the weakening market could further
delay the already slow pace of corporate debt restructuring. The
possible impact: a fresh wave of nonperforming loans for the country's
banks. To be sure, Malaysia's financial sector, which has been consolidated
and recapitalized since 1997, is in better shape today than it was
before the regional crisis. But a slumping stock market has made the
nation's banks reluctant to lend, further crimping private-sector
growth. Taking the Lead Faced with this prospect, the Malaysian government plans to take the
lead in fueling economic growth. Two weeks ago, Dr. Mahathir announced
a 3 billion ringgit ($789 million) fiscal stimulus package aimed at
cushioning Malaysia against the U.S. slowdown.
But Kuala Lumpur's intervention hasn't changed the negative sentiment.
Last week, Standard & Poor's Ratings Group revised its outlook on
Malaysia's long-term foreign currency rating to stable from positive
citing concerns over a widening fiscal deficit, political uncertainty
and Malaysia's highly centralized decision-making system.
Shrinking foreign reserves have added to the economic worries. At the
end of March, the central bank held enough reserves to finance about
four months of imports. But the 4% decline from February is the
largest single-month drop since reserves began to diminish in
mid-2000. Central bank Gov. Zeti blames the latest decline on increased overseas
investments by Malaysian companies, the repayment of foreign loans,
and some revaluation losses in a portion of the reserves held in
currencies that have depreciated against the ringgit. (Because it is
pegged to the dollar, the ringgit has appreciated about 8.4% against
the yen, 2.2% against the Singapore dollar, 5.9% against the rupiah,
2.7% against the baht and 4.4% against the won since Jan. 2.)
Export Expectations Still, currency traders say the steady decline in reserves may prompt
more Malaysians to abandon the ringgit and find ways to move capital
out of the country. Exporters -- who have been slow in repatriating
earnings, bankers say -- are more likely to hold revenues denominated
in foreign currency abroad if they suspect a devaluation of the
ringgit is coming. But is a devaluation coming? Some economists, like Mr. Bhaskaran of SG Securities, say there are
strong arguments why Malaysia should put off any devaluation for as
long as it can. For starters, altering the ringgit peg now could be
seen as an overreaction to the uncertainties in Asian currency
markets. "The other question is how much do you devalue," says an
economist at an international bank based in Singapore, who notes that
if Asian currencies continued to slide, Malaysia might be forced to
adjust the currency peg more than once.
Other economists say the key indicator to watch will be international
reserves. Should Malaysia's reserves fall below $25 billion -- enough
to finance just over three months of retained imports -- Kuala Lumpur
will have no choice but to re-peg the ringgit to stamp out capital
flight, these economists argue.
But there is a third group of analysts that believes devaluation
should take place sooner rather than later. "It's better to do it now
and not when capital has already fled the country," says a chief
currency trader with a foreign bank in Kuala Lumpur.
Central bank Gov. Zeti says Malaysia hasn't any fixed formula -- or
line in the sand -- for determining when to adjust its currency peg.
"We don't go by lines," she says. "Life is not so straight forward. It
is very complex." Write to Leslie Lopez at leslie.lopez@awsj.com.
http://interactive.wsj.com/ The Financial Times, UK Malaysia insists no new peg for ringgit
By Sheila McNulty Malaysians have been lining up at money changers and banks in recent
days, exchanging ringgit for US dollars on expectations that the fixed
exchange rate will be adjusted, or even dropped.
The authorities have issued repeated denials. "There is no reason for
anybody to speculate that the government should re-peg the ringgit,"
said Rafidah Aziz, minister of international trade and industry. "I
hope the people and investors believe the government and not the
analysts." Rumours circulating among analysts that the currency regime will be
changed have arisen in response to downward revisions in economic
growth projections, rising public sector debt and a fall in
international reserves. Some advocate adjusting the peg or returning
to a floating exchange rate to maintain competitiveness with other
currencies in the region, which have been weakening against the US
dollar. "The ringgit peg is exaggerating the external shock faced by Malaysia
since it runs the risk of an overvalued exchange rate," Barclays
Capital said this week. The ringgit has been fixed at M$3.8 to the US dollar since September
1998, when Malaysia shocked the global financial community by
withdrawing the currency from international circulation. The
authorities wanted to stop the heavy outflow of funds, started by the
regional financial crisis that began in mid-1997, and end the daily
uncertainty about where the currency was headed. Their longer term
goal was to shield the economy from continued volatility in global
markets. At the time, the authorities had denied the ringgit would be fixed,
which has meant that many Malaysians now ignore the latest string of
denials. But if official protestations stop, analysts suspect even
more Malaysians will turn in their ringgit.
"Bank Negara (the central bank) has to keep coming out to say, 'No,
there will not be any re-pegging'," says Gan Kim Khoon, research head
at Arab Malaysian Securities. "Otherwise people will speculate even
more." Malaysians are eager to hedge their bets because any change would lead
to a weakening in value, possibly close to M$4.20 to the US dollar. So
if Malaysians then trade back in their US dollars for ringgit, they
could make a significant profit. Bank Negara issued a statement this week saying competitive
devaluation of currencies will not bring any significant gains for
Malaysia, but instead lead to higher costs and a destabilised
environment. "Uncertainty and volatility of the exchange rate will be
highly destabilising and will not provide a conducive environment for
trade and investment," it said. "The stability of the exchange rate
is, therefore, vital to a country such as Malaysia."
While many analysts agree with that assessment, they suspect something
will have to give. The government recently revised down its economic
growth forecast for the year to 6 per cent, from 7.5 per cent. Some
private economists are predicting even slower growth. In addition,
Bank Negara's net international reserves were US$27.2bn at the end of
March, compared with US$28.7bn on March 15. That still is equivalent
to four months of imports, approaching the internationally accepted
minimum of three months cover.
Meanwhile, says Standard & Poor's, the financial analysts, "off-budget
bailouts" have added to fiscal pressures and net public sector debt is
estimated to reach 25 per cent of gross domestic product this year
compared with 6 per cent in 1993. "In the absence of deep-rooted
corporate restructuring, capital leakage likely will grow, while
foreign interest continues to wane." Barclays Capital, the investment bank, says the ringgit peg is
constraining policy options. "Unfortunately, politics will play a role
in determining Malaysian foreign exchange policy," it said. "In the
eyes of many foreign investors, this adds an unpredictability that may
continue to hurt sentiment in Malaysia."
If Malaysia were to adjust the peg now, analysts say it would hurt
politically linked companies with US dollar denominated debt, such as
Tenaga, the national power utility, and Telekom Malaysia, the former
monopoly telecommunications provider. It also would force up import
costs, which would impinge on the purchasing power of Malaysians at a
time when the ruling party already is losing ground to the opposition.
And it would only add to the general sense of insecurity, led by
concerns over where the economy and Mahathir Mohamad, the prime
minister of 20 years, are headed.
Mr Gan doubts the authorities will adjust the peg, which would
eliminate the main source of predictability and certainty to doing
business in Malaysia. If they did, he says, people will ask: "When is
the next re-pegging and to what level?"
http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/ |