Laman Webantu KM2A1: 4824 File Size: 9.5 Kb * |
Likas: Barrage of Kudos for Brave Judge By Star AFP 26/6/2001 12:07 am Tue |
http://thestar.com.my/ The Sunday Star Barrage of kudos for brave judge
The office telephone of High Court judge Datuk Muhammad Kamil Awang
virtually did not stop ringing after he had revealed that he was
instructed by a superior to strike off two election petitions without a
hearing. The calls as well as letters came from across the country and overseas,
praising and congratulating him for his courage in making the disclosure
which one newspaper said had "stunned the nation."
"I received a lot of calls and letters of congratulations. One fellow
put it very nicely ... at least I had done my duty to God, to Islam and
the country," Muhammad Kamil, who retires tomorrow when he turns 65,
told Bernama in an interview here.
The blitz of publicity which turned a comparatively low-profile judge
into an overnight celebrity came as Muhammad Kamil was preparing to
clear his desk at the civil court in Wisma Denmark here just days before
his retirement. In his written judgment read out at the Kota Kinabalu High Court on June
8, he declared the election of former Sabah chief minister Datuk Yong
Teck Lee in the Likas state constituency in the 1999 elections null and
void, after ruling that the electoral roll used was illegal and that
Yong had committed offences under the Election Offences Act.
But it was not so much the decision to nullify Yong's election which
generated public interest. It was Muhammad Kamil's remarks towards the end of his judgment in which
he said: "In my view it is an insult to one's intelligence to be given a
directive over the phone that these petitions should be struck off
without a hearing, and above all, it is with prescient conscience that I
heard these petitions. "God has given me the strength and fortitude, as a lesser mortal, to act
without fear or favour, for fear of a breach of oath of office and
sacrifice justice and above all, to truly act as a judge and not a
'yesman'." When it was suggested to him that he would be remembered for a long time
for his remarks since nothing like this had happened before, he said he
only hoped that what he did would start the ball rolling in efforts to
restore public confidence in the judiciary.
Among the many letters that Muhammad Kamil received, there is one that
he treasures most. It is from a "former boss" expressing hope that his action would
encourage other judges to discharge their duties without fear or favour.
Following his disclosure, former Chief Justice Tun Eusoff Chin was
reported in the media as admitting making the phone call to Muhammad
Kamil but giving a different version, saying that he had not directed
the judge to strike off the election cases but only wanted him to
expedite the cases as he had been "slow."
During the interview, Muhammad Kamil said he regarded Eusoff's
suggestion that he had misunderstood the directive as far-fetched.
"He shouldn't have brought this up. At first he denied calling me but
the next day I read that he admitted calling me," he said. The judge said he found it strange for Eusoff to have said that he was
slow when as Chief Justice, Eusoff had kept on delaying his transfer
from Sarawak (where he stayed for almost eight years) by saying that he
had done a good job and that there were no other Malay judges serving in
Sabah and Sarawak. Talking about the two petitions challenging the legality of the Likas
election, Muhammad Kamil described some of the evidence on the existence
of phantom voters, including non-citizens with illegally-obtained
identity cards, as "fantastic." "What happened during the trial was not reported in most newspapers,
only the judgment was reported. "During the trial lots of evidence was produced in court on the
irregularities of the electoral roll and even three senior federal
counsel who were present could not rebut this," he said.
He disclosed that one of the witnesses he subpoenaed to give evidence in
court was later found killed while another witness was kidnapped during
the lunch break. Asked about the "extra remarks" in his written judgment on the election
petitions which some people said should not have been there, Muhammad
Kamil said the remarks were known in law as obiter dictum (opinion of
the judge). In his judgment, he noted that many government departments did not
respond to letters and cited two examples.
One was where his son had applied for a temporary work permit in Sarawak
which was refused, and another where his daughter had applied for a
scholarship for a post-graduate course.
In both cases, there was no acknowledgment despite reminders.
Asked whether Yong, the Sabah Progressive Party (SAPP) president, could
again stand as candidate in the Likas by-election, Muhammad Kamil said:
"It's not for me to say. As election judge, I only say this candidate
has committed offences under the election law but I cannot charge him
because I'm in an election court. If the Attorney-General or somebody
wants to charge him under the criminal law, they can."
In his judgment, Muhammad Kamil found that Yong had committed offences,
including putting up four billboards bearing false statements against
another candidate, Datuk Harris Salleh.
"I cannot disqualify him (Yong). The Election Commission can, if it
wants," he said, citing a few other similar cases.
On his retirement plans, he said he had many options to consider but for
the moment he wanted to take a well-deserved rest.
"I have many options, people have been calling me to work as a
consultant, and of course universities are always short of law
lecturers," said Muhammad Kamil who specialised in constitutional law
during his years in the Attorney-General's Chambers prior to being
appointed a judge. On life as a judge, he said: "People say life as a judge is very lonely.
We should mix with the people, then we understand the conditions. You
know and understand the people and the conditions, because the law is a
living thing. You have got to bring it up to the present day. You cannot
have the law static." Here he quoted the late Tun Mohamed Suffian Hashim, the former Lord
President who died last year: "It's not so much the law that you know
but the common sense that you have." http://news.catcha.com/my/content.phtml?1&010&&afpnews.cgi&cat=malaysia&stor
y=010624084656.ns0gyvxr.txt Malaysian judge insists he was pressured to drop sensitive case
KUALA LUMPUR, June 24 (AFP) - A Malaysian judge who says his superior
pressured him by phone to drop a politically sensitive case has stuck to
his story despite a denial from the then-chief justice Eusoff Chin.
High court judge Muhammad Kamil Awang, in an interview carried Sunday by
the official Bernama news agency, described Eusoff's account of the
phone conversation as far-fetched. Muhammad Kamil sparked a furore this month when he said he had been
ordered by a superior in 1999 to drop a case alleging electoral fraud in
the eastern state of Sabah. Eusoff has since admitted telephoning Muhammad Kamil but has denied he
told him to strike out the petitions from two candidates who were
defeated in the state elections. Eusoff has said he called merely to direct the judge to speed up the
case and described this as normal practice.
Muhammad Kamil, who retires from office Monday at age 65, was quoted by
Bernama as saying Eusoff's suggestion that he had misunderstood the
directive was far-fetched. "He (Eusoff) shouldn't have brought this up. At first he denied calling
me but the next day I read that he admitted calling me," Muhammad Kamil
said. Despite what he described as pressure to drop the case, Muhammad Kamil
ordered a member of the ruling coalition, former Sabah chief minister
Yong Teck Lee, to vacate his seat in the state assembly.
The judge ruled that Yong won it with the help of "phantom (unregistered)
voters". The judge's comments sparked a furore in Malaysia, where critics of the
government say judicial independence has long been under threat. Police
have begun an inquiry into the case. Muhammad Kamil said he had received many calls and letters of
congratulations. He described some of the evidence of electoral fraud produced during the
1999 hearing -- including non-citizens with illegally-obtained identity
cards -- as "fantastic". The judge was quoted by Bernama as saying one of the witnesses he
subpoenaed to give evidence was later found killed while another witness
was kidnapped during the lunch-break. No details were given and the judge could not be reached for comment.
The opposition Sabah United Party at the time accused the ruling
coalition of using "dirty tactics" to win the state polls.
It complained to police that it had proof 30,000 immigrants were issued
Malaysian identity cards to allow them to vote.
|