Laman Webantu KM2A1: 5254 File Size: 7.1 Kb * |
MGG: The Mentris Besar And Forest Reserves By M.G.G. Pillai 19/8/2001 10:16 pm Sun |
The Mentris Besar And Forest Reserves
Where the Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia now is was for half a
century Malaysia's pristine forest reserve of several hundred
acres. The Selangor mentri besar of the day, Dato' Harun Idris,
and his executive council, allowed the forest reserve to be
logged of mature virgin timber and offered the site for the
university. When the public became aware of his ecological rape,
the deed was done. Dato' Harun pleaded ignorance about its value
as a forest reserve or indeed if it was one and blamed his
executive council and civil servants for not telling him of its
value. The forest department was not consulted: when money is
there to be made in the bushels, no one, not even a chief
minister, wants to be told he cannot.
Twenty one years later, a smaller ecological rape takes
place, also in Selangor, under a different but equally
politically ambitious mentri besar. Political correctness has
seeped into Malaysian culture in the meanwhile without
understanding what it meant. Forest reserves had become wildlife
sanctuaries. One now beats the government for denying wild life
a sanctuary, not for denuding forests. But both are a euphemism
for corruption. The Zoo Negara will be moved from its site in
Ulu Klang because the Selangor state government has found that
land to be too valuable for a zoo; the area would create a few
millionaires of those allowed to turn it into housing estates.
Tan Sri Muhammad Muhammad Taib, as he calls himself now, is
an UMNO vice president and was mentri besar of Selangor when in
1992 305 ha of a 575 ha forest reserve in Bukit Sungei Putih was
declared not a forest reserve. Like all mentris besar, he is
autocratic as they come. He brooks no opposition. To make sure
he has all on board, the state executive councillors are allowed
their own side deals. No state executive councillor, certainly
not a mentri besar in a National Front administration, could ever
be forced into penury. So, silence is the norm when state
reserves are raped, as in Bangi and in Cheras.
Not only in Selangor. The mentri besar of Malaysia's
smallest state, Perlis, rapes his forest reserves. The
accusations Dato' Fauzi Abdul Rahman hurled at the former Pahang
mentri besar, Tan Sri Khalil Yaakub, centred on alienating forest
reserves. Tan Sri Muhiyuddin Yassin is a wealthy man today
because as mentri besar of Johore, such opportunities as
alienating forest reserves came his way. One mentri besar of
Perak, the father of the present, became so wealthy that the
sultan, as in Johore against Tan Sri Muhiyuddin, rebelled. He
went on to become Malaysia's ambassador to the then United Arab
Republic, now Egypt. As the former mentri besar of Trengganu,
Tan Sri Wan Mokhtar Ahmad, is now ambassador to Saudi Arabia.
It is worse in Sabah and Sarawak, where timber reserves are
immense and corruption a way of life. One application for forest
land to keep a company from closing down and throwing 2,000
workers in Sabah is a scandal: millions have been given in
"donations" but the licence has not come through, and the file is
now before the Prime Minister. The system of rotating chief
ministers has the immediate effect of money collected with the
decision left to his successor, which he would not because he had
not been paid. In Sabah and Sarawak, it was the practice to give
every state minister a substantial timber grant for every year in
office, making them instant millionaires. I do not know if that
is still so. But the chief minister of Sarawak, Tan Sri Abdul
Taib Mahmud, is widely believed to be one of the richest
politicians in Malaysia. As his uncle and predecessor, and
later, Yang Dipertuan Negara, Tun Abdul Rahman Yaakub was before
him. When uncle and nephew are chief ministers for 30 years, it
is a fair bet that it breeds corruption to an unmatched degree.
The Anti-Corruption Agency director-general, Dato' Zulkipli
Mat Nor, when asked about the Cheras land, would not comment. "I
don't wish to comment. No comments, no comments on this." Why?
Because the people involved are those who belief they have a
bright future in federal politics? Could the Anti-Corruption
Agency refuse to comment months after it started investigations
into the matter? The ACA, like Suhakam on human rights, is an
embarassment to the government, set up to keep the public at bay.
It was defanged in 1969 after it forced two mentris besar -- of
Trengganu and Perak -- out of office for corruption. One irony
of that is the ACA chief then is today deputy chairman of Suhakam
-- Tan Sri Harun Hashim. The ACA now cannot, indeed do not have
the power to, investigate corruption in the higher reaches of
government and the National Front -- unless the person to be
investigated has fallen foul of the leaders.
So, Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim is investigated but not ..., oh
well, never mind. Long years in office encourages corruption,
especially if it is in the same ministry. The late Tun Sardon
Jubir, an UMNO stalwart who after years in the cabinet went on to
be Malaysian ambassador to the United Nations and United States
and governor of Penang, once told me he retired when his UMNO
division in Johore wanted him to resign because he was preventing
others in his division from making money. It is the march of the
times. Corruption is more insidious now than it ever was. But
no one, not even the Prime Minister, would address it as he
should. Politics is turned upside down that if a high ranking
official is charged or investigated for corruption, it is a sign
he is no longer in political odour with the UMNO president. His
former deputy would give you chapter and worse on that.
When the government drifts, as now, and dissent, in the
cabinet, in the party, in the country is viewed as treachery and
anti-government, something must give. It is not enough to arrest
and jail a few policemen for accepting a few hundred dollars in
bribes -- if you offer anything less, you would find yourself
charged with corruption instead -- but it should start at the
top. Tan Sri Muhammad Muhammad Taib has still explain how he
came to have RM2.4 million in foreign currencies in Darwin a few
years ago, or how he could pay off a former wife, the daughter of
his sultan, the equivalent of US$5 million. Or how she, with
him, came to own a lucrative piece of real estate in Shah Alam
when he was mentri besar. Or is it a requirement of the job that
he should not know where forest reserves and wildlife sanctuaries
are? The breast-beating now is akin to shutting the barn door
after the horse has bolted. M.G.G. Pillai |